20:00:28 <wilcal> #startmeeting 20:00:28 <Inigo_Montoya> Meeting started Thu Dec 6 20:00:28 2018 UTC. The chair is wilcal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:28 <Inigo_Montoya> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 20:00:47 <davesnothereman> HiYa 20:00:53 <wilcal> HiYa David 20:00:59 <Benmc> Dave 20:01:28 <wilcal> #chair davesnothereman 20:01:28 <Inigo_Montoya> Current chairs: davesnothereman wilcal 20:01:34 <wilcal> you got the chair dave 20:01:52 <DavidWHodgins> #topic * Who's new? - If you are then come and say hello 20:02:05 <DavidWHodgins> Oops. Please chair my current id 20:02:35 <wilcal> # chair DavidWHodgins 20:02:38 <DavidWHodgins> #topic * Who's new? - If you are then come and say hello 20:02:54 <wilcal> #chair DavidWHodgins 20:02:54 <Inigo_Montoya> Current chairs: DavidWHodgins davesnothereman wilcal 20:02:57 <DavidWHodgins> #topic * Who's new? - If you are then come and say hello 20:03:04 <DavidWHodgins> There. Thanks! 20:03:22 <DavidWHodgins> So, anyone here who hasn't been to a qa team irc meeting before? 20:03:51 <DavidWHodgins> Doesn't look like it, so ... 20:03:54 <DavidWHodgins> #topic * M7 Status & Testing. Is Beta1 ready for release? 20:04:10 <MageiaTJ> I'm not new, but my IRC client is. Using M7 Konversation today, installed just hours ago. 20:04:21 <DavidWHodgins> Anyone encounter any problems they think makes it worthwhile holding back the release? 20:04:27 <wilcal> I'm kinda leaning with tmb it needs testing by a larger group of people 20:04:49 <wilcal> there's lots of good going on here but still some nasty gremlins 20:05:01 <hviaene> 32-bit is a disaster for me. 20:05:15 <wilcal> on real hardware or Vbox client 20:05:16 <DavidWHodgins> Agreed. I've only done a little bit of testing, but from what I've seen, this has been the best first beta release we've ever had. 20:05:19 <MageiaTJ> Martin says the same about the release. 20:05:23 <hviaene> In general problems with Intel graphics 20:05:30 <wilcal> It's really good 20:05:34 <bri_an> some nvidia graphics issues too 20:05:37 <DavidWHodgins> Ah. My system is amd graphics 20:05:56 <Benmc> some hardware I have absolutely no issues with Mga7, others - well..... 20:06:11 <tarazed> nvidia seems to be good on recent hardware. 20:06:14 <MageiaTJ> No problem with Intel graphics here, on 64-bit. 20:06:24 <DavidWHodgins> That's why I think it's time to go for release. Get more people with more of a variation in hardware. 20:06:44 <Benmc> as Martins said, we cant hold out for a perfect release 20:06:54 <wilcal> I agree David 20:06:57 <kekePower> MageiaTJ: Working on fixing hardinfo. 20:07:00 <tarazed> Seconded 20:07:03 <hviaene> Not booting is far from perfect 20:07:03 <wilcal> not at beta1 20:07:09 <rindolf> I ran into a transient bug with the graphics in mga7 with sandy bridge graphics and plasma5 - fixed after a restart 20:07:10 <DavidWHodgins> If there are no objections, I'll go ahead and inform the council that M7 beta 1 is ready to go! 20:07:11 <tmb> yeah, its definately good enough as a beta1... it even behaves like a RC for many 20:07:15 <MageiaTJ> kekepower: Thanks! 20:07:32 <wilcal> yes, in places it's got some big wrinkles 20:07:46 <Benmc> whenwill there be a version freeze Dave? 20:08:00 <wilcal> I did two netinstalls this morning to Vbox clients 20:08:14 <bri_an> I think it would be okay. My challenge was with mate and nvidia 6150le graphics (was 304 driver). 20:08:17 <tarazed> wilcal: do we put that in the release notes? ;-) 20:08:19 <hviaene> Release with a warning on 32-bit?? 20:08:25 <DavidWHodgins> Tenatively, Jan. 2nd, 2019 20:08:26 <tmb> the suggested version freeze is Jan 2nd, 2019 20:08:46 <kekePower> I am going to try to see if the locale bug is fixed. Last time I tried, eng system, norwegian keyboard, it didn't work 20:08:48 <wilcal> sounds like a plan 20:08:51 <kekePower> that was yesterday 20:08:59 <wilcal> here's a bad problem 20:09:02 <wilcal> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23863 20:09:04 <[mbot> [ 23863 – Timing of the nfs mount not working? ] 20:09:15 <wilcal> it's an old problem too 20:09:40 <DavidWHodgins> That is definitely not worth holding a beta 1 release for. 20:09:50 <wilcal> agreed 20:10:52 <wilcal> take a look at this tmb: 20:10:54 <wilcal> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23878 20:10:54 <hviaene> BTW all my tests were in Dutch, no problem with that (if it boots) 20:10:55 <[mbot> [ 23878 – UEFI boot drives are not swappable between identical systems ] 20:10:59 <wilcal> i don 20:11:07 <DavidWHodgins> Announcement sent to the qa-discuss and council mailing lists 20:11:10 <wilcal> i don't know if that's a bug or a feature 20:11:24 <DavidWHodgins> #info Mageia 7 beta 1 approved for release 20:11:28 <bri_an> I guess nvidia 304 doesn't matter 20:11:50 <DavidWHodgins> It does, but not enough to hold a beta release 20:12:10 <tmb> bri_an, there is no nvidia304 support 20:12:13 <DavidWHodgins> It will have to be fixed before the rc release, for sure. 20:12:14 <wilcal> I have nothing I'm working that would hold up a beta1 re;ease 20:12:26 <tmb> only nvidia340, nvidia390 and nvidia-current 20:12:30 <wilcal> lots of things need to be fixed before release 20:12:32 <MageiaTJ> Unfortunately, nvidia says it's EOL. 20:12:37 <bri_an> yup - goes to nouveau. It worked fine from xfce lives, not so for mate classic. 20:12:38 <DavidWHodgins> Ouch 20:12:56 <bri_an> I am testing xfce from classic 64bit now 20:13:30 <DavidWHodgins> Hopefully noveau will get better between now and when we produce the rc candidate. 20:13:32 <tmb> bri_an, you can also try to use modesetting driver 20:13:34 <Benmc> cinnamon not working 32 or 64 -need a not for release ntes 20:14:21 <Benmc> try again: cinnamon not working 32 or 64 -need a note for release notes 20:14:22 <DavidWHodgins> For a first beta, just having the primary desktop environments (kde/gnome/xfce) getting to a gui is good enough. 20:14:45 <DavidWHodgins> Or in the errata 20:15:08 <bri_an> :tmb I'll try that 20:15:29 <tarazed> Cinnamon has been working here - 64bits. 20:15:41 <wilcal> I did a Vbox client netinstall UEFI x86_64 Plasma install this morning. install and boot to desktop works but reboot does not. Legacy works just fine. I've checked this error at least 3x. 20:16:03 <wilcal> I'm going to generate a bug on this 20:16:04 <MageiaTJ> My HP printers are working in Plasma, a nice plus. 20:16:05 <DavidWHodgins> Doesn't look like the Mageia 7 errata page has been set up yet. Someone volunteer to do so? 20:16:57 <DavidWHodgins> The release notes are to list what is present in terms of versions and new software. Known errors belong in the errata. 20:17:10 <MageiaTJ> Gotta go. My brother needs my help.... 20:17:14 <wilcal> We should set up a master bug for all the release blockers 20:17:36 <DavidWHodgins> Benmc: As you have an error to add, mind setting up the m7 errata? Start with a copy of the m6 one, for the layout. 20:18:20 <Benmc> thanks for the vote Dave, i will have a look 20:18:49 <DavidWHodgins> :-) 20:18:53 <DavidWHodgins> Thanks 20:20:09 <Benmc> also to note: lives and nvida340 wont complete build from live menu - with proprietary drivers 20:20:50 <Benmc> I waited 1/2 an hr, then went to bed 20:20:52 <DavidWHodgins> Does noveau work ok with it? 20:21:29 <DavidWHodgins> 340 or 304? 20:21:30 <Benmc> if installed from the live desktop works ok, just not from the live disk boot menu 20:21:39 <Benmc> 340 20:22:09 <Benmc> its in one of Tjs e-mails 20:22:37 <DavidWHodgins> That's nasty, but if it works ok with noveau, that's a work around that's good enough for beta 1 to go public so we can get more testers. 20:23:58 <DavidWHodgins> Let's move on then. 20:24:02 <DavidWHodgins> #topic * Testing updates - Any questions or problems 20:24:07 <bri_an> nouveau worked on 304 and 393, so guessing it'll do 340 20:25:02 <DavidWHodgins> flash is easy to test. nextcloud, just ensure the update installs cleanly over the prior version, and doesn't require database rebuild etc. 20:25:05 <wilcal> freaking flash player again 20:25:22 <DavidWHodgins> Used to be about once a week for flash. 20:25:34 <wilcal> Jan 2020 and Mozilla is pulling support for Flash 20:25:41 <DavidWHodgins> Will be happy when it's gone. 20:26:16 <DavidWHodgins> Thanks everyone for the great work keeping the list of updates waiting down so short. 20:26:18 <bri_an> it's just the client I think on nextcloud 20:26:40 <bri_an> if I can I'll spin up my nextcloud server and then set up a client or two 20:26:50 <DavidWHodgins> There are two bugs. One for the client, one for nextcloud itself. 20:26:56 <bri_an> ohhh 20:27:18 <DavidWHodgins> Likely they should be approved together, or not at all. 20:27:40 <DavidWHodgins> I hae't looked to see if the client update requires the server update. 20:27:46 <bri_an> ok - I'll update the server and confirm, then update client 20:28:02 <DavidWHodgins> Thanks 20:28:26 <DavidWHodgins> That just leaves ... 20:28:29 <tmb> and there is a new kernel built I will assign to qa after I've built the kmods 20:28:29 <DavidWHodgins> #topic * Anything else 20:28:37 <wilcal> nothing else from me 20:28:56 <wilcal> I've got to write at least one more bug for M7 20:29:05 <DavidWHodgins> tmb: So not super security critical like some kernel updates in the past. 20:29:24 <DavidWHodgins> Just a normal security update. :-) 20:29:37 <rindolf> tmb: btw, do you know if kernel 4.19.x will be LTS? 20:30:12 <tmb> well, it adds STIBP protection support on x86_64, but meh... 20:30:19 <tmb> rindolf, it is LTS 20:30:35 <rindolf> tmb: ah, nice 20:30:55 <DavidWHodgins> From what I saw, the existing spectre mitigations cover it pretty well. 20:31:24 <DavidWHodgins> What was this one called. split spectre? 20:31:36 <tmb> yeah, and full STIBP will make your system crawl :) 20:31:49 <DavidWHodgins> Ouch. 20:32:11 <tmb> Single Thread Indirect Branch Predictors protection 20:32:40 <DavidWHodgins> :-( 20:32:45 <tmb> the first revision of it killed of 20-50% but the polished one should behave better 20:33:16 <DavidWHodgins> Wow. Much worse of an impact than the existing mitigations then. 20:34:24 <DavidWHodgins> amd and intel will be laughing all the way to the bank as everyone upgrades to whatever they release next with the mitigations built into the hardware, hopefully without performance loss. 20:34:47 <bri_an> I was just thinking that. Core i9 anyone? 20:35:00 <tmb> yeah, well the first revision used a "big hammer", whereas the polished one tries to be smart of how heavy protection to enable by default, and according to both Intel and Amd full protection is a no-no 20:35:08 <tarazed> Yes, and it is a bit slow on Cauldron 20:35:56 <DavidWHodgins> Definitely don't want people to see that in the beta 1 release. :-) 20:36:15 <DavidWHodgins> They'd blame us instead of intel/amd. 20:36:16 <tmb> yeag, I'm going to review if we want to switch to a "lighter protection" by default, but for now ... 20:36:21 <bri_an> yeah - so far, m7 has performed decently on my older equipment 20:36:37 <wilcal> same here 20:36:52 <DavidWHodgins> I've barely gone past install, boot and login. 20:37:06 <tarazed> Yes, OK for me too, but noticeably skower on an i9 decacore. 20:37:15 <tarazed> slower 20:37:15 <DavidWHodgins> If it gets that far, that's good enough for beta 1. 20:37:20 <bri_an> yikes 20:37:22 <bri_an> on i9 20:37:51 <bri_an> I've actually spent some hours on my laptop with m7 and another machine 20:37:59 <bri_an> it is functional - decent beta1 for sure 20:38:25 <wilcal> I've spent some considerable time on real hw uefi with M7 20:40:32 <DavidWHodgins> My system can boot in uefi mode, but it's a real pain as it requires keyboard intervention every boot going through the setup menu to select uefi mode. 20:40:44 <wilcal> I'm done David 20:40:53 <DavidWHodgins> So I normally only use it in bios firmware mode. 20:40:58 <Benmc> Just received a package from China, 2 x 512GB laptop SSD , any guesses what Im doing this weekend 20:41:11 <bri_an> :-) 20:41:13 <DavidWHodgins> Yeah. Countdown time 20:41:17 <DavidWHodgins> Benmc: :-) 20:41:21 <DavidWHodgins> t - 5 20:41:22 <DavidWHodgins> 4 20:41:25 <DavidWHodgins> 3 20:41:27 <DavidWHodgins> 2 20:41:28 <wilcal> My new Qnap NAS is a gem 20:41:31 <DavidWHodgins> 1 20:41:39 <wilcal> bye all 20:41:41 <DavidWHodgins> Thanks for coming everyone. 20:41:47 <DavidWHodgins> #endmeeting